Here are links to some interesting stories we didn’t get to this week. Have a good weekend!
The New York Times reviews an exhibition in Connecticut of the works of Charles Ethan Porter, a remarkable talent who flourished in the years after the Civil War. The story reconstructs some details of the life of one of the first African-Americans to make a living as an artist.
A concert at the Corcoran Gallery in Washington focused on contemporary African-American composers of classical music. [via the Washington Post]
Moving to a medium-sized town can be challenging for an African-American professional, and keeping them there can be challenging for the small towns. The Binghamton Press & Sun-Bulletin interviews African-Americans moving in and moving out of the Southern Tier counties of New York, as well as what their employers are doing to try and help them settle in.
The Voice of America features a new online project of the New York Public Library called “In Motion: The African-American Migration Experience”, which maps the movement of people from the slave trade to the migration to the industrial north, as well as more recent immigration from Africa. The curator of the exhibit says
For far too long, the history of the African-American experience has been written as a history of our victimization, what others have done to us. With the migration theme you begin to see what people of African descent have done for themselves.
The Wall Street Journal reports on recent trends in pay and promotion in the private sector, and discovers that
[P]rogress for women and minorities in terms of both pay and power has stalled or regressed at many of the nation’s biggest companies.
I am on a health kick and a cheapskate kick. I am also on a “too lazy to cook kick” that has lasted for at least 10 years. One day while I was directing my Subway sandwhich artist how to construct my sub I had an epiphany. I can get all these ingredients at the grocery store. Nothing requires cooking. My “sandwich artist” is just slapping ingredients on bread. I could do this.
And so, the next day instead of going to subway I went to the grocery store. I grabbed (1) chicken, turkey and roast beef cold cuts from the deli, (2) lettuce, tomatoes and onions from the produce section, (3) some cheese (also from the deli) and (4) whole wheat bread.
All these ingredients cost me about as much as a twelve inch combo meal. But, instead of one sandwich I got at least a weeks worth of sandwiches I could have anytime I felt like. Keeping sandwich ingredients handy has been a great way to save time and money. The best part about sandwiches is that they require little to no preparation and even less clean up. If you have tips about preparing quick and/or inexpensive food let us hear about them in the comments!
In August of last year I posted a piece on an approach to managing a dress shirt collection. My shirts take a beating everyday, snags, ink stains, baby vomit and other bodily fluids, etc. I want to wear quality that lasts.
After reading the article, one of my more stylish friends told me I had it all wrong. “Try Charles Tyrwhitt (”CT”),” he said. CT shirts come in a variety of colors, styles and shapes. The shirts will normally cost you at least $100 but various styles are often on sale for $40. Try the slim fit style so you don’t look like a paratrooper. Add monogram for $8. CT shirts are available in New York, London and online.
The largest news story that the mainstream media covered over the weekend is most likely Hillary Clinton’s recent attack on Barack Obama for arguments made in one of Senator Obama’s campaign mailings.
From a black American perspective, there were significant “developments” made at this year’s State of the Black Union (SOTBU). Generally, I believe that the SOTBU is more show than anything else. While I applaud Tavis Smiley for having a day of service for the city of New Orleans, in my opinion his conference fails year after year to make any impact on a macro level. Watching parts of the conference can be entertaining and his guests usually make valid points but I have not seen any evidence to suggest that the SOTBU’s impact has been significant or far reaching.
This conference was a bit different than past events. At this year’s SOTBU, we literally saw the monolith that is the “black leadership” crumble before our eyes. Jack and Jill Politics did an excellent job of breaking down all the action. There was a clear division among African American liberals in support of either Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton. The debate was fierce as supporters for both candidates made their case. Stephanie Tubbs Jones and Sheila Jackson Lee made their arguments citing the experience of Senator Clinton and tried to appeal to women citing the American woman’s struggle for equality. However, the crowd was clearly pro Obama.
One highlight of the debate was when Al Sharpton came to the defense of Obama putting forth both cogent and passionate arguments on the issues of seating the Michigan and Florida delegates.
At another point during the discussion, Tavis asked panelist Dick Gregory a question about Obama. The question was clearly set up by Tavis so that Dick Gregory could criticize Obama. Instead, Gregory directed his commentary toward the Clintons.
It was widely reported that Tavis was displeased with Barack Obama for declining the invitation to come speak at the event. Some theorized that it would hurt Obama to attend because he would leave himself open to being painted as the black candidate.In a letter to Mr. Smiley, the Obama campaign said that Barack would be busy campaigning in Ohio and Texas. The campaign offered to send Michelle Obama, but the SOTBU people declined to accept the Obama campaign’s offer. Let’s think about that for a minute. The potential first lady offers to come to your conference and you decline! Not smart Tavis. I wonder if Bill would have been turned down if Hillary said she couldn’t make it.
However, to the clear dismay of most of the audience, Hillary Clinton did decide to attend and was given several minutes to make a speech and then sat down with Tavis to answer softball questions from the host. One of my favorite moments of the night was right before Senator Clinton arrived. Tavis was introducing Mrs. Clinton and asked the crowd to be “respectful.” It was very reminiscent of the speech your high school Principal gives right before somebody boring is about to speak.
In summary, Michael Steele’s comments captured quite nicely what we are seeing with this election and the Obama movement. As he put it, there were those who got us a seat at the lunch counter, but now we must change our mentality so that we can take ownership and not just settle for access. I believe what we are watching play out is a battle between those who have access to political power vs. those who want ownership.
If you have any thoughts of the SOTBU we would love to hear about them in the comments!
And now, a couple of random asides…
For those who watched the SOTBU this year, can you have a better panel member than Cornel West? His active listening abilities are off the charts. When another panelists speaks, Dr. West’s posture and verbal asides like “mm hmm and “that’s right” transform each panelist’s comments into profound cannons of wisdom. I would pay Dr. West to be in the room for any presentation. I guarantee he will make you look good.
I believe the “race vs. gender” argument the two congresswomen alluded to during the SOTBU is a tough argument to make given the audience. In the context of Hillary Clinton vs. Barack Obama, the argument forces black women to compare the obstacles faced by their fathers, husbands, brothers and sons to those of a white woman. Black men are going to win that contest every time.
I was recently searching for free e-books when I ran across an interesting book entitled How to Live on 24 Hours a Day (”HL24″) by Arnold Bennett. The book was written in the early 1900’s by Bennett. HL24 is considered a precursor to modern productivity and self help books. The book is a quick read and packed with helpful nuggets of information. I liked it so much I bought a copy of the book even though it can be found for free on the Internet.
The first tenet of the book is that we are all given the same amount of time everyday. A wealthy man and poor man both get 24 hours a day. The wealthy man can not buy himself anymore time. Accordingly, all men are equal when it comes to the time you are given in a day. Once you understand this, it follows that men that know how to get the most out of their 24 hours will excel where others who are not so efficient will fail. With that context, over the next couple of weeks we will explore [author]’s thoughts on just how a man should go about getting the most out of his day.